Chapter Two
THE CASE STUDY
Let’s pick back up to the summer of 2021 and move a bit further north. One of the most prolific steelhead runs in the world, the incredible Skeena River, indicated that its migratory fish return would be far below escapement goals (meaning, the number of salmon that “escape” fisheries and return to freshwater to spawn). Upon hearing this, as someone with a connection to this river and its stunning tributaries, I found myself in a profound contradiction of emotions. Getting down to it, the Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development (who oversees the fishery) decided to open the fishery for an abbreviated recreational steelhead season. Included in this were a number of regulatory changes and recommendations. One of these recommendations (you can probably see where I’m going here), was for anglers to adopt a “One & Done” approach.
Amidst this opening, there were a lot of voices participating in the conversation. Some of which were anglers choosing simply not to fish, claiming that the fishery shouldn’t even be open to recreational anglers. It’s a touchy subject here, and with everyone having a voice these days, well, let’s just say the pot got stirred. And we now had an official One & Done recommendation on arguably the most storied, prolific steelhead fishery in the world.
When you look objectively at the decline, it’s important to note that the causes of these low returns are from a number of factors... And some are more impactful than others. These factors include deforestation of river habitat, hydro dams, global warming, commercial fishing (and bycatch), and the use of gill nets for harvesting. The truth of the matter is, considering these factors, single-barbless-hook catch-and-release recreational angling has a relatively small impact on the fish. That said, one must understand that while recreational anglers do have a small impact on the fish, they also act as steward... a critical bellwether for the resource.
Considering the impact from these factors, if you close a fishery to recreational angling, it’s not going to solve the problem. You can remove the anglers, yet the runs will keep trickling down and down. You would be hard-pressed to show me any closure of a river to recreational angling that has brought back stocks. What we need are big, impactful changes. If we are really serious about saving these fish, we need to ban the usage of gill nets (and any other non-selective methods of harvest). We need to limit deforestation near fish habitats. We need a re-evaluation of commercial fishing practices. We need the removal of dams and fish farms. And we need to demand better, science-based decision-making at all levels of government to prioritize the resilience of key species like wild steelhead. This is not a case of whataboutism. These are the changes that will actually move the needle during a time of need. And they are within reach.
For me personally, this manifested in donating half of my pay from this year’s commercial work on the Skeena tributaries via the Coast to Clouds Conservation Foundation (C2C). C2C distributes funds to organizations such as the Native Fish Society, Skeena Wild, the Steelhead Society of BC, as well as directly funds projects like the Lower Skeena Pound Trap. This pound trap acts as a gill net replacement to promote more sustainable harvesting practices. Beyond this, I continue to donate a portion of my work time and royalty-free usage of my creative assets to a handful of other conservation organizations.
However, if you remove these recreational anglers (beneficiary-stewards) from a river, it’s like removing the canary from the coal mine… This will only quiet the ones who are sounding the alarm. They are also the ones who are willing to get dirty and do the work to save these fish.
In this year’s case, with the Skeena fishery open for a shortened season, anglers do need to be aware of their potential impacts and limit themselves accordingly. There is something especially commendable about reducing your effectiveness. And I think that’s very appropriate right now for a lot of fisheries. But in either case, do not remove yourself from your stewardship of the resource. Keep your boots in the water and keep fighting for the fish. You’ll do more good fighting for them with a rod in your hand than you will in silence.